If the a lady erred inside her menstrual history, she might end up with sexual affairs within a taboo big date

Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s statement: “R. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”

Amoraim couldn’t dispute tannaitic rulings versus tannaitic assistance however they written fences inside the Torah to eliminate inadvertent sins

Which declaration because of the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi fundamentally eliminated every menstruating females on the typical menstrual classification and you will place him or her on the unpredictable updates of zava since most typical attacks last at the least three days. Seem to their concern try that because of the cutting-edge clarifications needed to decide when one is niddah and if one may getting a beneficial zava, you to definitely you will started to go wrong with grievous effects. Very first new decree got restricted feeling; it appears to be to own been local, and will was restricted to situations where doubt are inside it in addition to regional population wasn’t good enough discovered to decide in the such as things ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Yes it was not a general decree for everybody away from Israel, however it try the initial step because guidance. In the 1st several instances, Rabbi’s statement works with a woman who tends to be a zava or possibly a good niddah. This woman is handled in the first situation as a beneficial niddah, which have a good seven-go out ages of impurity, unlike one day out of impurity for the day out-of bleeding, which is the laws getting a small zava. Regarding 2nd example the woman is managed just like the a great niddah and you will a small zava in case your first day got in the the woman ziva months (the new 11 days between menstrual attacks). From the 3rd problem, she actually is handled while the a whole zava. All the three rulings grab the significantly more strict condition.

Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi )

Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. Afterwards he stood to pray.” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.