John Dwyer, North carolina, 1756
John Dwyer and you may Jacob Blount sure by themselves to expend fifty weight to help you “the Sovering Lord King George the next their Heirs and you may Successors” to the 29 Could possibly get 1756, when you look at the a wedding bond. The obligation mentioned, “The latest conditions regarding the duty one to while a marriage is supposed between John Dwyer and you will Jemina A lot of time all of it county from Tyrrell aforementioned, Virgin woman, Today when there is no lawfull trigger in order to impede the new said relationships, then your more than responsibility to get emptiness…” nine
Joshua Farrell, Pennsylvania, 1785
Inside 1785, Thomas Harrison, Currier, and you can Joshua Farrell, Mariner, of the Town of Philadelphia, registered to the a thread due to the up coming marriage out-of Joshua Farrell and you can Mary Anne McCartney. ten Although this list is technically on the termination of the brand new Leading edge War, it’s still a so good illustration of this new colonial time ties.
“The condition of the obligation is such, that in case there shall perhaps not hereafter arrive any legitimate let or impediment, by the reasoning of any Pre-contract, Consanguinity, Affinity, and other simply Produce whatsoever, but that the over-said Joshua Farrell and you can Mary Anne McCartney, can get lawfully Wed; which there is not any Suit mainly based before every judge, to own or about the these Pre-contract; as well as have if for example the said Events, and each of them, was of one’s full Age of Twenty-one Age, and are usually not in Tuition out of their particular Moms and dads, otherwise feel the full Concur off their Moms and dads or Guardians respectively to your told you Relationships; of course it, otherwise possibly of those, aren’t indented Servants, and you will do and you will shall cut simple and keep indemnified these-stated John Dickinson Esquire…and you will shall simultaneously help save harmless and keep indemnified new Clergyman, Minister, or Individual that shall get in on the said People in Relationships, to own, otherwise of the Cause out of his so starting; upcoming which Obligations as Void as well as nothing Effect, normally to face completely Force and Virtue.”
In my own search, I’ve come across numerous matrimony bonds to have my forefathers and you can lookup sufferers. One to, such as for instance, ‘s the marriage regarding my personal husband’s 4th-great-grandparents, Lewis Tharp and you may Joanna Western.
Lewis Tharp and you can Joanna Western have been married for the Fauquier Condition beautiful Toyota women, Virginia within the 1805. The only real number that stays of its relationship is the thread, that has brand new concur off Joanna’s dad. As she was not yet twenty-you to, her dad, John West, given his authored permission. New bondsman is William West, who was probably this new aunt off Joanna Western. eleven
George Tharp and Polly Noland, Virginia, 1801
An alternate thread I found whenever evaluating south west household members are the wedding bond regarding George Tharp and you may Polly Noland. The text try dated 12 January 1801 during the Fauquier State. John West is the brand new bondsman. twelve
I computed there had been a few associations ranging from George Tharp with his bondsman, John West. First, John West are the bro from Polly Noland. Polly’s mommy, “Gemime Noland,” given their consent for Polly to help you get married George Tharp, just like the she wasn’t yet decades 21. Jemima (Arnold) Noland are the brand new sis of Bathsehba Arnold, who had been the fresh new spouse off John West. Jemima is widowed once Polly are partnered, that is most likely as to why buddy John Western try expected as the latest bondsman.
The second partnership anywhere between John Western and you may George Tharp would be the fact John Western paid off fees having George Tharp inside 1799 and you can 1800. 13 This may imply that George Tharp try utilized by John Western, possibly because the an apprentice or slave. Men whom functioning other people was usually guilty of paying the fees of them servants or apprentices. 14
Lascia un Commento
Vuoi partecipare alla discussione?Sentitevi liberi di contribuire!